Download A critical view at the historical institutional development of academic
Document related concepts
Transcript
A critical view at the historical institutional development of academic political science in Mexico Enrique Gutiérrez Márquez Universidad Iberoamericana Karla Valverde Viesca Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Abstract Today, Academic Political Science in México observes an unprecedented boom and political scientists play a role that in the past belonged to other academic and institutional sectors. Nowadays, political science professionals hold a capacity of influence in social and political decision-making process, and they are many who have created private consultancies, are involved in media and social organizations or have joined into the Legislative, Judicial and Executive powers at federal and local levels. More than sixty years have passed since the establishment of Political Science in Mexico, so it is necessary to develop a critical reflection on its institutional development in order to identify new horizons and promote new research agendas. In this sense, it seems relevant to ask some questions about its history: what are the currents or theoretical approaches used in Mexican Political Science to explain the social and political phenomena? What is the responsibility of academics and social scientists to explain problems and to propose solutions to them? What the academic community of political scientists need, to be present in national and international debates? What is needed to create links between researchers? How to disseminate research in political science and encourage the solution of certain national problems? These questions and more are open. Research agenda is large and probably we will be discussing these issues over the next few decades. In Mexico, the construction of new social, economic, political, cultural and educative structures, suitable to the new requirements and social interactions imposed by the transition between the XIX and XX century; presented some challenges to the intellectuals of that time, one of them is the need to explain the events that happened during the revolutionary period and at the same time to think about the cementation of a new national project. Within this context, the work assumed by these intellectuals helped to consolidate academic and disciplinary institutional spaces related to the Social Sciences, from that moment on, they were used to inquire, identify and to solve the main national problems. During this process, two events happened simultaneously that contributed to the emergence of the Mexican Political Science ad a new discipline from the Social Sciences. The first one is that the Mexican State, republican itself, assumed the role of referee of the economic, political and social activities thus defining a direct action in the organization and execution of the new national project. The State had an interest to work with specialized professionals that could contribute to give meaning to its actions and the decision-making process at the different governmental areas (Arguedas, 1979; Labastida y Valenti, 1991). The second one is the presence of a different academic way of thinking, which also had infrastructure and personality by its own, this constituted a fundamental and necessary event for some knowledge spheres, mainly those similar to the Social Sciences that contributed to build a national project based on the 1917 Constitution. Similarly to other places in the world, at Mexico the State was the one that promoted the Human and Social Sciences as a formative space for specialists that could think and give answer to the problems and situations of that age (Paoli, 1990). It is then that the first essays and journalists articles appeared written by the intellectual community; they were still impregnated with positivism, evolutionism and nationalism. Those intellectuals1 were the ones that during the first two decades of the 20th century, based on the academic and professional practice, pushed for the creation of specialized educational institutions, among them stands out the Universidad Nacional de México, founded in September 22th of 1910. Afterwards, between 1930 and 1950 it is possible to identify that this same community consolidates as the creator and director of the cultural institutions in the post-revolutionary Mexico. The Universidad Nacional de México obtained its autonomy in 1929 and converted in the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. It was the first institution where the first steps to understand the national reality were taken. The objective of this work is to describe the beginning and evolution of the Political Science as an institutionalized discipline. For that purpose, four stages of study are proposed: 1. Background for the institutionalization of the Political Science in Mexico, 1930 – 1950. 2. Beginning of the Academic Political Science in Mexico, 1951 – 1970. 3. The investigation of Political Science and the extension of the educative offer, 1971 – 1990. 4. The expansion and consolidation of the discipline: new interpretations of the political phenomena, 1991 – present. It is interesting to analyze the four stages proposed simultaneously to the evolution of the Mexican State since 1920 (Table 1). Some elements of the context that favored the institutionalization of the State also helped to build the Mexican Political Science, first as a discipline and then as an Academic Political Science with its own movement. 1 In his text Desarrollo y organización de las ciencias sociales en México, Francisco Paoli Bolio, talks about the process of creation of the Social Sciences in Mexico. In particular, he documents an intellectual debate between Antonio Caso and Vicente Lombardo Toledano which shows the situation at those years and also the relevance that economy, psychology, political science and sociology teaching had at that time for those considered philosophers, lawyers and men of science. Table 1. Link between the evolution of the Political Science and the development of the Mexican State (1920 – 1990). Period Characteristics of the Mexican State 1920-1940 Structure The beginning of the creation of institutional infrastructure. The State assumed the role of social referee; intervention in the direct offering of services. A direct action of the State apparatus can be observed in the organization and execution of the development national project. 1941-1969 Direct action 1970-1982 Direction and orientation of the development 1983-1988 Direct intervention and corresponsibility 1989-Present Restructuration The public investment is channeled towards the social and economic development. The State capacity to direct and orient the economic development consolidates. The State participates in the production and distribution of goods and services through public enterprises. Planning is incorporated as a State intervention mechanism as an answer to the huge increase of public enterprises. The State intervention is redefined and its direct participation in the economic process is weakened. The process of disincorporation of public enterprises is initiated. The reform of the State is the main course to follow. Transition between an interventionist State and one solidary. New mixed systems of social welfare are created, based in a Stage 19301950 Political Science evolution and its institutionalization Background for the institutionalization of the Mexican Political Science. 19511970 Beginning of the Academic Political Science in Mexico. Research in the Political Science and the extension of the education offer. 19711990 1991 – Present Expansion and consolidation of the new relations between the State and Society. discipline: new interpretations of the political phenomena. Source: Prepared by the authors based on Valverde (2008) and Gutiérrez (2011) data. PROCESS OF INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE POLITICAL SCIENCE IN MEXICO Within the process of institutionalization of the Political Science in Mexico it is possible to identify different components that define each stage of the four proposed to its study. Among them, 13 are highlighted: 1) Influence of the positivist thought to promote studies in the Social Sciences area; 2) the need to have intellectuals and professionals of new disciplines; 3) the creation of a school to prepare Political Science professionals; 4) The foundation of the Centro de Estudios Políticos (CEP) as a place for research and academic work; 5) The creation of Political Science graduates that will prepare future politologists; 6) Design, creation and consolidation of own lines of research; 7) Expansion of the discipline and increase in the national programs; 8) Increase of the students enrollment; 9) Academic quality, evaluation of programs and accreditations; 10) Professional impact of the graduates; 11) Formation of national PhD’s and researchers; 12) Actual weight of the discipline in the Social Sciences; and 13) Creation of researchers and professionals associations. First Period: Background for the Institutionalization of the Political Science in Mexico, 1930 – 1950. By the end of the XIX century an increase in the study of the political phenomena can be observed and a movement towards the official recognition of the discipline and its acceptance in the academic institutions of that age can be identified (Farr, 1999; Flores, 2004; Harto de Vera, 2005). Thus, the development of the Political Science promoted the idea to prepare administrators and professionals more capable. This helped in the foundation of faculties and schools of Political Science and Administration. The different topics analyzed by this discipline were disseminated by the specialized journals. In 1886 happened the publication of the two first journals, the American Political Science Quarterly and the french journal, Annales de l’ École Libre de Sciences Politiques. Additionally to this process of foundation and expansion of the Political Science it is important to mention that in 1903 the American Political Science Association was constituted. From this time on, it is possible to distinguish the Political Science as an area of knowledge and an Academic Political Science2 as a space of disciplinary reflection that includes political scientists, universities and research centers; periodic publications; and an increase number of participants that as a whole show the conformation of a real epistemic community (Gutiérrez, 2009 and 2011). During the period that includes the two World Wars, an increasing State intervention in politics is present, and also its relations with society tighten. 1948 is a milestone for the Political Science because by expressed request of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), the most recognized experts of the political and social phenomena reunite in Paris with the purpose to redefine and determine with clarity its objects of study. The deliberations concluded, at least partially, with a list elaborated under the heavy influence of the Anglo-Saxon thought. This list included the topics and lines of reflection that would allow the Political Science to build a specific object of investigation of its own, different to the ones of other disciplines like Law, Philosophy, Economy and even Sociology (UNESCO, 1950). Nevertheless the list included an enumeration of topics, it does not specifies a categorical or conceptual definition nor a unique concept, essential or distinctive of what political. It is still a reference for the elaboration of theoretical frames, the construction of university programs and a guide for the reflection of the discipline. The topics proposed were included in what popularly is known as a “UNESCO type list”, as it is showed in the next table: Table 2. Reference list from UNESCO for the research of the Political Science General line of investigation I. Political theory Specific line of development a) Political theory b) History of the political ideas II. Political institutions a) Constitution b) Central government c) Regional and local government d) Public administration e) Economic and social functions of the government f) Compared political institutions III. Parties, groups and public a) Political party opinion b) Groups and associations c) Citizen participation at the government and administration. d) Public Opinion 2 The Academic Political Science is a conceptual proposal that explains, at least some extent, the sophistication and specialization of the activity. The professor Enrique Suárez-Iñiguez is the only one that works this concept for the Political Science in Mexico. To study this topic the followings texts can be consulted: “La Ciencia Política académica mexicana” in, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, México, XXXVII (147), pp. 213-220, 1992. “La Ciencia política en México“, en Ciencia Política, Democracia y Elecciones, México, FCPyS-UNAM, pp. 69-92, 1989. “The role of political theory in the teaching of political science in México”, 1989. “Political Science in Mexico in the Cold war and Post-cold War Context”, 1994. IV. International Relations a) International Politics b) International organization and administration Source: Prepared by the authors based on UNESCO (1950) data. Towards the middle of 20th century, at least five schools with their own disciplinary development influenced the origins and destiny of the political and social knowledge and also the origin of the Political Science in Mexico: the Escuela Nacional de Jurisprudencia; the Escuela de Altos Estudios; the Escuela de Economía; the sociological perspective; and, the Spanish school represented by the exiled teachers and intellectuals. Second Period: Beginning of Academic Political Science in Mexico, 1951 – 1970 It is difficult to identify the beginning of the Academic Political Science in Latin America, nonetheless, after the Second World War it is possible to consider some events that suggest its development (Barrientos, 2013). In Latin America, each country adopted the discipline following internal dynamics of their own university and academics. Thus, an uneven development followed but also caused diverse discussions about the object of investigation of the Political Science; the definition of politics and politic and even the nature of the disciplinary studies in which the debate was between using a name in singular as Political Science or in plural as Political Sciences, mainly because its unified nature or the influence of other disciplines to it. At the end, both denominations were adopted indistinctively to understand the discipline that studies the public administration and the international relations. it can be observed a common line and constant in their process of institutional constitution which is the preponderant presence of other disciplinary spheres like Law and Sociology, those marked the origin of the Academic Political Science in the nations and also promoted their slow process of autonomy, growth and consolidation. Birth of the Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Politicas y Sociales (ENCPYS) As new economic, social, political and cultural processes appeared, the Academic Political Science in Mexico constituted a regulated and normed space with an epistemic community eager to think about the political issues but also ready to fight for the predominance of the mechanisms used to explain the political and social realities of the country. In other words, this area allowed the reunion and formation of a scientific tribe (Latour and Woolgar, 1995), specialists and specialized, that would talk the same language and would work as speakers of the different projects that supported the development of the country, even in other spheres of the social life. The Political Science is introduced mainly through two external ways in Mexico. First, by the consolidation of a trend of Americans academics known as “mexicanista”, dedicated to study the national issues and which publications had a great influence in the academy and in politics in Mexico. The work of Friedrich Katz is an example of this. Second, by the end of the Second World War it can be observed an influence of the United Nations Organization (UNO) through UNESCO, aimed to guide the construction of institutional spaces that would think about the global political problems, to reorder the world aiming to assure peace and to avoid a new conflict. These external processes would add to the internal dynamic and to the mission of Dr. Mendieta y Núñez, director of the Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, of supporting the creation of Social Sciences schools. During the period of Luis Garrido, Lucio Mendieta y Núñez present the proposal to establish the ENCPyS. Even when its creation was approved by the H. Consejo Universitario of the UNAM on May 3th of 1951, the school would open its doors on july 9th of that same year in some installations outside university campus. Its first director was a lawyer, Dr. Ernesto Enríquez Coyro, who rejected the UNESCO idea to form theorists without art or practice, they would be named, invented by Daniel Cosío Villegas, politologists. In 1957, the Mexican president Adolfo López Mateos inaugurated in Ciudad Universitaria the buildings of the Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales 3. Originally, the school offered four academic programs of undergraduate courses: Political Sciences, Social Sciences, Diplomatic Sciences and Journalism. At that moment the inclusion of the public administration was discarded because that would invade the space of reflection of the Escuela de Economía, founded in 1929. The first programs were mainly inspired by the French and Belgian models, in particular the one from the École de Sciences Politiques of the Lovaina University in Belgium (Torres, 1990; Sirvent, 2004). The creation of the first academic program of an undergraduate course of Social and Political Sciences show some similarities with the experience of the Economy courses because it was also an answer to the necessities of the country. In this case, the impulse came from the changes of the postwar in the world and the determination of the elite at power to incorporate Mexico in the new international reality. The apparition of the ENCPyS was inscribed among the Latin-American and global tendency of the 1950’s decade, which contributed to consolidate the schools dedicated to study the Social Sciences (Peschard, 1986). Its objective was to create the new social scientists through solid preparation that would also allow them to being dedicated full time to the study of the social reality. The consolidation of the school had important effects for the whole Universidad Nacional and for the country (Paoli, 1990). The first organ of formal communication for the discipline was originated with the Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas in 1955. 3 It is important to mention that in 1945, the Congress passed the Project of law to create Ciudad Universitaria. Those installations were formally opened in 1954. During the 1953 – 1957 period, the director of the ENCPyS at UNAM was Dr. Raúl Carrancá y Trujillo. From 1857 to 1961 was Dr. Pablo González Casanova who was reelected for a second period. First, this organ was consolidated as an autonomous space with own research objects, also it had methodological tools differentiated from those used by Law and Philosophy (Colmenero, 1991). Second, it forced a rearrangement inside the UNAM and outside of it with the purpose to form an institutionalized body of academics working on the development of these disciplines. Third, it showed the necessity to educate specialized people emphasizing on the professional characteristics of the new disciplines. Finally, it gave a new vision to the interpretation of the social and political phenomena from perspectives never seen before. Certainly, during more than a decade, the UNAM was the only educational institution that formed professionals in this discipline. Afterwards, in 1964, the Universidad Iberoamericana (UIA) was the first private educational institution, that created undergraduate courses on Political Science at its new campus located south in Mexico City. That same year, the undergraduate course on Political Science began at the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California (UABC) at Mexicali, capital of that state, north of the country. By the end of the 1950’s decade and the beginning of 1970 the sociology of the Latin American development is fortified also the structural functionalist focus, with its premises of objectivity, neutrality, clean ideology, statistical empiricism and methodological emphasis (Castañeda, 2004). Also, internal factors inside the country like the contraction of the economic growth, the political and social crises of 1958 and 1959 (Colmenero, 1991), and external factors like the Cuban Revolution, lead to the questioning of the developing theories. To confront these new challenges, since 1957 directed by Pablo González Casanova 4, a fundamental actor in the development of the Political Science in Mexico, not only because of his academic administrative work but also because its intellectual contributions that meant a renovation in the way the politics and policies were studied inside the school. For the undergraduate courses in particular, he proposed to modify the program originally oriented to the legal thought towards sociological and philosophical foci. By 1958 the Political Science approached to the public administration instead of promoting its autonomy and independent development, until it was tied to the same degree (Peschard, 1986). Thus the incorporation of the public administration in the program of the ENCPyS, a new undergraduate course was offered under the name of Political Sciences and Public Administration. From this moment on, there were two options to study: one related to the research work and other related to the professional exercise in the governmental area. The 4 In 1957 he was designated as Director of the Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales. In 1959 he was also president of the directive committee of the Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales in Santiago, Chile. On the next decade, he was director of the Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales of UNAM (1966). In 1968 he was president of the Latin American Sociology Association. In 1970 was elected dean of the UNAM. He is author of the now classic text, La democracia en México, published in 1965. During the 1968 – 2000 period, he founded the Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades at UNAM. French idea that distinguished between the Political Science and the Political Sociology prevailed, this idea consider the first one as the integral study of the State (Paoli, 1990) and the second one as the study of power in relation with society. Process of Specialization and Professionalization of the Discipline At the same time this process was happening in the Universidad Nacional, since 1960 a new group of political scientists was created inside the Centro de Estudios Internacionales of the El Colegio de México. This group was influenced by the advances of the American Political Science and was exposed to other disciplines like History, Economy and International Relations. Also they received an influence through those who continued their formation at the Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO) at Chile, where the CEPAL oriented economy was above the sociology. This resulted in an attitude of criticism between those two disciplines that gave birth to the Dependence Theory. This Sociology would influence the Political Science in Mexico. For many years, the academic activities in the Superior Educational Institutes concentrated mainly in the academic activities which responsibilities rested on the professionals that dedicated only a few hours to teach some course at the university. Although, as the need to form highly qualified resources, the UNAM created in 1968, the Division de Estudios de Posgrado which offered the first Master and PhD programs in Political Science. This action lead to the transformation of the Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales to the Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales (FCPyS) which contributed to the creation of an academic community that fortified the specialization process and the professionalization of the discipline in benefit of the university and of the country. Another relevant issue that helped to the institutionalization of the science in general and to the Political Science in particular was the creation of the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) in December of 1970. This organism had as its objective to support the formation of scientific resources through scholarships that it would offer to study postgraduate courses abroad. With this, it also favored the creation of national postgraduate courses which were nurtured by the graduates formed in France, England and the United States. Also, it contributed to promote the consolidation of the Political Science as an area of knowledge. In 1968, after the student conflict, the Mexican State needed to recover its credibility, to open new spaces and to restructure its relation with the civil society. To achieve this, it was needed to question and criticize the institutional bases of the post-revolutionary social pact, the unfulfilled promises of the economic, political and cultural model in Mexico. The discourse that supported this process was the one of the sociologists and politologists. Never before the Sociology and the Political Science had such a predominant place as it occurred during the 1970’s. Third period: Research In Political Science and the Expansion of the Educational Offer, 1971 – 1990. During the period from 1971 to 1990, two events define the impulse for the development of the national Political Science. One is the conformation of a solid group of political researchers that created a systematic way of working in harmony with the area of investigation, not only at UNAM but also at other universities which were interested in offering an academic program of undergraduate courses of Political Science. With this expansion of the offer the increase in the number of students followed. By the beginning of the 1970’s, as Silva notes (1989: 95), an over ideologization occurred in the Social Sciences discourse, mainly the sociological and politological. Thus, the analysis of the new social realities was substituted for a doctrinary work of learning without questioning some thoughts of Marxism. This eliminated the teaching and discussion of other paradigms in the Social Sciences resulting in a delay of other interpretations and way of analyzing the national problems. The way of thinking the social – political reality was substituted by a dogma; the field work was replaced by the desk work and in there the instrumental and analytic problematic intensified resulting in the theory impoverishment of the research made. The 1970’s decade is fundamental to the discipline for various reasons, overall, because of the impact of 20 years of work the Political Science had done. During that time the governmental and administrative institutions experienced an increase in their areas of participation and intervention, under the economy development mixed model, the creation of the UNAM and particularly of the FCPyS, caused new opportunities opened for the disciplinary development matching those modifications. Also, during that decade the Departamento de Especialidad en Ciencias Políticas is transformed to the Centro de Estudios Políticos (CEP) (Pérez, 2004; 303); it was composed by a body of full time professors dedicated to research relevant characteristics of the Mexican political system and its actors. By 1971, when the CEP was formed, its role inside and outside the faculty has oriented the discipline and the guild of politologists in Mexico. The topics of interest that the CEP started to work were: ideology and political thought; political aggrupations and interest groups, social classes and social groups; the State, public institutions and political parties; and university and student movements. The results of those researches were published in leaflets, journals, books and by 1970’s mid-decade in the Revista de Estudios Políticos, edited by the CEP itself since 1975 and in the Revista Mexicana de Sociología, edited by the Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales. In September of 1974 the first professional association was born in Mexico: El Colegio Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Administración Pública (CNCPAP). 30 years after the creation of the Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales (1951) needed to happen to graduate the first Mexican Phd in Political Science, He was Arnaldo Córdova, his doctoral research ended with the publication of the now classic text, La Ideología de la Revolución Mexicana (Merino, 1999). Other remarkable graduates of the doctorate programe of Political Science were: Enrique Suárez Iñiguez, Octavio Rodríguez Araujo and Carlos Sirvent Gutiérrez, whom conformed the first generation of professional experts in the discipline and started the tradition to teach new generations of politologists. Almost three decades needed to happen for a change in the national political context and the expansion of this area of knowledge that would result in an identifiable community of Mexican politologists. The first master thesis in Political Science inside the FCPyS – UNAM is the one of Luis A. González Martínez in 1979. The creation of postgraduate programs and the creation of CEP were important actions to consolidate the disciplinary identity that helped the expansion of teaching and research of Political Science from that moment on. This increase in the educational offer is the second element that shows the importance of the 1970’s decade for this area of study. Because the increase represented also more students, so in quantitative terms there were also advances. Academic progams offer and increase in registration In 1972, the UNAM and the Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales offered a new type of teaching with the Sistema Universidad Abierta, the academic programs were reachable to other sector of the population that didn’t have the opportunity to study in the traditional way. Also, the creation of the undergraduate courses of Political Science in the Escuela Nacional de Estudios Profesionales in Acatlán (ENEP – Acatlán) was supported and achieved (Sirvent, 2004). The process of decentralization promoted by the government caused the creation of universities in other states of Mexico. The main model to follow was the UNAM with a goal to prepare the students in the technique and the administrative formation, in order for them to incorporate in the administrative work of the governmental offices and the increasing number of State enterprises. In 1976 the newly created Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM) in Iztapalapa, Mexico City opened the undergraduate courses of Political Science, oriented to academic research. During the 1970’s decade according to the data of the Asociación Nacional de Universidades e Instituciones de Educación Superior (ANUIES) the quantity of programs nationwide increased from 3 to 17 and the students registered grew from 613 to 2,752. This has been a constant and maintains at the present. The expansion is an element that allow to identify its ulterior consolidation and also constitutes a definitive factor of diversification of the student characteristics as a phenomena that provoked the widening of the topics and research objects of interest (Gutiérrez, 2011: 387). During the 1980’s decade, the Political Science achieved a protagonist place that coincides with the increase in the interest of the public affairs among different sectors of the Mexican population and also because the specialized scientific community grew stronger; they created publications, departments and investigation centers. This decade must be considered a period of delay in the development of the discipline, although it benefited from the theory and empirical advances, the Mexican contribution as a whole is marginal. During these years, the Mexican Political Science remained outside the debates about its scientific nature, methods, object of study and its relation with other sciences. Those discussions occurred in the United States and other countries like France, Italy and the United Kingdom. The volume of research production and the increase of politologists focus their analyses in the problems of the Mexican reality like: representation and political participation, balance of powers, federalism, local governments, presidentialism, democratization and democracy consolidation, among others (Loaeza, 2005:201). The consolidation of Political Science as a discipline needed a new definition of its politological profile since the labor market was expanding and diversifying, this phenomena asked for knowledge about politics and policies and to look for answers of the national political problems (Peschard, 1986: 178). The politological point of view would need to offer novelty elements and also effective to reach better decisions and to answer a society surrounded with problems in the political and social frame (Bokser, 1999). The educational offer, during the 1980’s tose years, duplicated from 17 to 36 academic programs, while the registration practically tripled from 2,752 to 7,565 students. This tendency towards the expansion of the discipline has maintained to the present. During the last 20 years, 36 new programs were opened and the registration increased to 11,588 students, that 53.2% more that when that period started. Fourth period: Expansion and Consolidation of Discipline: New Interpretations of the Political Phenomena, 1991 – Present Towards the dawning of the 21st century, the knowledge field of Mexican Political Science reached an important degree of consolidation. The reason that could explain the increase of academic spaces and registration of the discipline in the Mexican universities in the last 20 years can be found in the transformation processes of the political system started during the 1980’s. Today Mexico is more plural and diversified in cultural, social and political terms. Without a doubt, this scenario has awaken the interest and expectations of young people to know the political reality and to look for solutions to its problematic, at the same time, they perceive that studying this discipline is also an attractive option in order for them to enter the labor market and develop professionally (Puga, 1997). From the 1990’s decade, important transformations can be observed in Mexico, mainly in the institutional arrangement of the State and in the organizations and structures. From this moment on, the State, selected carefully to its members among those legitimized with certain technician and scientific criteria oriented towards the neoliberal, neocapitalist modernization model. The political options were called technical options and this is when the idea spreads out that no other can make better decisions than the so called experts or specialists (Gallegos, 1989). Those facts modified the investigation agenda and even to the Political Science as a discipline was affected. The incorporation of new topics for the political analysis and the formation of an increasing number of PhD’s in Political Science had an important impact in the consolidation of the Academic Political Science in Mexico. Even after the expansion of the education offer in the country, as it is showed in Chart 1, by 2012, 65% of the national Political Science researchers of the country belong to the National Researchers System and are concentrated in the metropolitan areas. Chart 1. SNI researchers in Political Science by regions, 2012. Source: Prepared by the authors based on data by Roqueñi (2013). About the expansion of the discipline it is important to mention the increase of the undergraduate programs offered in Mexico. In 1951 existed only one program of Political Science and in 2010 at least one of the universities in 29 of the 32 states of Mexico offered one of it. In those states, during the academic period of 2009 – 2010, existed 87 Political Science programs, In regional terms, the data presented in Chart 2 show that a concentration of those programs exist within Mexico City and the metropolitan area. Chart 2. Political Science undergraduate programs by regions (Academic period 2009 – 2010) Source: Prepared by the authors based on data by Roqueñi (2013). After analyzing the behavior of the student registration during the academic period of 2009 – 2010, it can be observed that Mexico City and the State of Mexico are the entities where the majority of students are concentrated with a total sum of 5,262. This situation impacts directly in the regional distribution, and again the metropolitan zone of Mexico City is the one that has the majority of the students registered in an undergraduate program related to Political Science. Aiming to guarantee the academic quality of the national programs of the superior education, in 2000, the Secretaría de Educación Pública (SEP) created the Consejo para la Acreditación de la Educación Superior, A.C. (COPAES). This is a fundamental component in the process of institutionalization of the discipline since it allows to identify the number of programs natiowide and their quality. The first association of Social Sciences appeared in 2002 with the creation of the Asociación para la Certificación y Acreditación en Ciencias Sociales (ACCECISO). Two years later, in 2004, the first Political Science and Public Administration undergraduate program was qualified. At present time at least 30 academic programs has been qualified5. Another distinctive element in the creation of the institutional structure of the Political Science is the creation of the professional associations (Suárez – Iñiguez, 2013). Although exist two historical examples, the Colegio Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Administración Pública (1974) and the Asociación Mexicana de Ciencia Política, created by the Dr. Enrique González Pedrero during de 1980’s. Until 2012 it was constituted the Consejo Mexicano de Investigación en Ciencia Política, A.C. (COMICIP), reclaiming both previous efforts, it included remarkable researchers of all the country6. That same year, the Asociación Mexicana de Ciencia Política (AMECIP) was created. Final thoughts In the university space and research of Social Sciences, the systematic study of politics has promoted the development of the discipline, it has gained specificity and has appropriated some objects of investigation from other areas of knowledge. Along the country were formed departments and research centers dedicated to this specialty, in public and private institutions. Also, the number of students registered in undergraduate and graduate courses 5 For further information, COPAES: http://www.copaes.org.mx/FINAL/inicio.php Also, ACCECISO: www.acceciso.org.mx 6 For further information: www.comicip.org.mx has increased and there has also been a growth in the edition and publication of specialized journals and books dedicated to the professional political analysis. Around Political Science, a knowledge community has emerged, dedicated to the study of various power related topics according to shared scientific rules. Epistemic communities that share a language, theory interests, all of them observant of the advance of the discipline in other countries, adding theory and empirical efforts, in order to solve the relevant political problems. This process suggests the existence and the consolidation of Political Science in the country. It was a complex activity that fortified itself as a real space that simulated the structural and present conditions of the national and international context. Nowadays, the growth of the academic programs, the number of researchers, the institutional consolidation, the creation of epistemic communities and the number of students registered is quantitative superior. In the last 20 years, if compared to other social disciplines, that increase may seem marginal. After a few decades in which the discipline was under the shadow of the Public Administration, now one can find a science that in its Mexican version was nurtured by all the economic, humanist and social disciplines. This fact explains the reason it enriched from different theory perspectives and also explains the critiques made about the scientific status of the Political Science. A characteristic element of the disciplinary development in Mexico can be found in the explosion of the politics as an activity, as a topic of general interest and as a discipline in the field of Social Sciences. Until the decade of the 1990’s it can be observed a systematic publication of results in articles and specialized books. Today, the Mexican Political Science lives an unprecedented growth and the politologists guild serves a role that in the past was taken by other academic and institutional sectors. The professional politologists in Mexico have an influence capacity in the governmental, social and political decision – making processes, some of them have created consulting companies, they participate in the media and in civil organizations or has incorporated in the Legislative, Judicial and Executive power in the federal and local spheres. There is a long road to travel, it is a necessity to develop new research because the reflection about the discipline has been lacking in the investigation agendas. It would be wise to present some questions about its history, but particularly about its future. Which are the theory tendencies or foci that the Mexican Political Science use to explain the political and social phenomena?; Which is the responsibility that the academics and social scientists have to explain problems and propose solutions?; What does the academic community need to do to have a role in the national and international discussions?; How to create dialogue between researchers?; How to transmit the Political Science research in order to help in the solution of national problems? This questions and some more are unanswered. The investigation agenda is wide and surely this topics will be debated in the next decades. Bibliography Adams, Herbert Baxter (1920): Johns Hopkins University Studies in Historical and Political Science, Baltimore: Biblio Bazaar/LLC. Aguirre, Juan: “Los fundadores de la Ciencia Política en Argentina” en, Anales, Second epoch XXIV, Núm.17, Buenos Aires: Academia Nacional de Derecho y Ciencias Sociales (1979). Álvarez Díaz, Ángel y Said Dahdah: “La ciencia política en Venezuela: fortalezas pasadas, vulnerabilidades presentes” in, Revista de Ciencia Política, Vol. 25, Núm.1, Santiago: Instituto de Ciencia Política, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (2005), 245-260. Andrade Carreño, Alfredo (1998): La sociología en México: Temas, campos científicos y tradiciones disciplinarias, México: UNAM- FCPyS. ANUIES: “Anuario Estadístico 2010”, Anuario Estadístico de Educación Superior, <http://www.anuies.mx/content.php?varSectionID=166>, [Consulted: 27/03/2013]. Arguedas, Ledda y Loyo, Aurora: “La institucionalización de la sociología en México” en, Sociología y Ciencia Política en México. Un balance de 25 años, México: UNAM (1979), 5-40. Barrientos del Monte, Fernando: “La Ciencia Política en América Latina. Una breve introducción histórica” en, Convergencia. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 61, México: UAEM (2013), 105-133. Benítez Centeno, Raúl COMECSO/CONACYT. (1987): Las ciencias sociales en México, México: Bokser Liwerant, Judit: “El estado actual de la Ciencia Política” en, Merino, Mauricio (1999): La Ciencia Política en México, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 23-55. Burdeau, Georges et al. (1979): La Política y el poder, San Salvador: UCA Editores. Burdeau, Georges (1982): Tratado de Ciencia Política (trad. and coord. Enrique Serna Elizondo), México: Escuela Nacional de Estudios Profesionales- Acatlán, UNAM. Carrancá y Rivas, Raúl: “Raúl Carrancá y Trujillo (1953-1957) México, Semblanza” en, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Vol. 30 (115-116), January - June, México: UNAM (1984), 2-16. Castañeda, Fernando (2004): La crisis de la sociología académica en México, México: UNAM-FCPyS/Miguel Ángel Porrúa. Castañeda, Fernando: “La constitución de la sociología en México” in, Paoli Bolio, Francisco (coord.) (1990): Desarrollo y organización de las ciencias sociales en México, México: CIIH-UNAM, 397-430. Colmenero, Sergio (1991): Historia, presencia y conciencia, Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales (1951-1991), México: UNAM-FCPyS. Colmenero, Sergio (2003): Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales (1951-2001), México: UNAM-FCPyS. Consejo Mexicano de Investigación en Ciencia Política (COMICIP) (2013) Estadísticas sobre la ciencia política en México (1951 -2012). Cordero, Salvador: “Desarrollo de la investigación en Ciencia Política en México (análisis de una década)” in, Meyer, Lorenzo (1986): La Ciencia Política en México: Estado actual y perspectivas, México: FCPYS-UNAM, 309-352. Córdova, Arnaldo (1978): Los grandes problemas nacionales, México: Editorial Era. Farr, James (coord.) (1999): La Ciencia Política en la Historia; programas de investigación y tradiciones políticas, Madrid: Istmo. Flores Santiago, Verónica (2004): La Ciencia Política, Lima: Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas-Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Escuela de Administración y Ciencias Políticas. Gallegos, Carlos: “Perspectivas de la Universidad” en, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, New epoch, 135-137, April - September, México: UNAM (1989), 1323. Garcé, Adolfo: “La Ciencia Política en Uruguay: un desarrollo tardío, intenso y asimétrico” en, Revista de Ciencia Política, Vol. 25 (1), Santiago: Instituto de Ciencia Política, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (2005), 232-244. Girola, Lidia y Gina Zabludovsky: “La teoría sociológica en México en la década de los ochenta” en, Sociológica, Vol. 6 (15), México: UAM-A (1991), 11- 63. González Casanova, Pablo (1967): La democracia en México, México: Era. González Casanova, Pablo: “Corrientes críticas de la sociología latinoamericana” in, Nexos, 5, México: (1978), 14–17. González Casanova, Pablo: “La nueva sociología y la crisis de América Latina” in, Morales, Boils, et al. (1979): Las ciencias sociales en América Latina, México: UNAM. González Casanova, Pablo (1999): Ciencias Sociales: Algunos conceptos básicos, México: Siglo XXI. González Martínez, Luis (1979): El status de Puerto Rico: Documentación de una polémica, México: TESIUNAM. Gutiérrez Márquez, Enrique: “La Ciencia Política como una ciencia social y espacio de interacciones. Una aproximación teórica” in, Romero, María Elena y Valverde Viesca, Karla (Coords.) (2009): Teorías y problemas contemporáneos. Reflexiones desde la Ciencia Política, México: Universidad de Colima- UNAM, 17-38. Gutiérrez Márquez Enrique y Patricio Marcos, “Ciencias Políticas” en, Lourdes M. Chehaibar Náder (Coordinadora general) La UNAM por México, México UNAM, 2010., 388-413. Gutiérrez Márquez Enrique, “La Ciencia Política Académica en México, campo de interacciones sociales” en, Carlos Gallegos Elías y Rosa María Lince (coordinadores) ¿Cómo Investigamos? ,Editorial UNAM, México, 2010, 249-266. Gutiérrez Márquez, Enrique (2011): Desarrollo histórico institucional de la Ciencia Política Académica en México. Del campo de conocimiento al campo de las interacciones sociales, Doctorate thesis in Ciencias Políticas y Sociales con orientación en Sociología, México: Programa de Posgrado en Ciencias Políticas y Sociales de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Harto de Vera, Fernando (2005): Ciencia Política y Teoría Política contemporánea, Madrid: Trotta. Janet, Paul (1887): Histoire de la science politique dans ses rapports avec la morale, París: F. Alcan. Jeanetti Dávila, Elena: “La formación profesional de cientistas políticos y administradores públicos” en, Paoli Bolio, Francisco (1990): Desarrollo y Organización de las Ciencias Sociales en México, México: CIICH/UNAM. Labastida, Julio y Giovanna Valenti: “Las Ciencias Sociales en México. Elementos para un diagnóstico” en, Revista de la Universidad, Vol. 46 (485), México: UNAM (1991). Latour, Bruno y Woolgar, Steve (1995): La vida en el laboratorio. La construcción de los hechos científicos, Madrid: Alianza Editorial. Leal y Fernández, J. Felipe; Andrade Carreño, Alfredo et al. (coord.) (1994): La sociología contemporánea en México, perspectivas disciplinaria y nuevos desafíos, México: UNAM. Loaeza, Soledad: “La Ciencia Política: el pulso del cambio mexicano” en, Revista de Ciencia Política, Vol. 25 (1/192 – 203), Santiago: Instituto de Ciencia Política, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (2005), 192-203. Mendieta y Núñez, Lucio: “Origen, organización, finalidades y perspectivas de la ENCPyS” en, Revista Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Vol. 1 (2), México: UNAM (1955), 3555. Merino, Mauricio (1999): La Ciencia Política en México, México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Meyer, Lorenzo: “La Ciencia Política y sus perspectivas en México” en, Colección Historia Mexicana XXI, 2, México: UNAM (1971), 285-311. Meyer, Lorenzo y Camacho, Manuel: “La Ciencia Política en México; su desarrollo y estado actual” en, Arguedas, Ledda; Camacho, Manuel et al. (1979): Sociología y Ciencia Política en México: un balance de veinticinco años, México: UNAM, 63-102. Paoli Bolio, Francisco (1990): Desarrollo y organización de las ciencias sociales en México, México: UNAM-Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Humanidades. Paoli Bolio, Francisco (2002): Conciencia y poder en México: siglos XIX y XX, México: Editorial Miguel Ángel Porrúa. Pérez, Fernando y Tapia, Martha Laura (2004): Facultad de Ciencias Políticas, Historia Testimonial de sus directores, México: UNAM-FCPyS. Perló Cohen, Manuel (coord.) (1994): Las Ciencias Sociales en México: Análisis y Perspectivas, México: COMECSO/UNAM -Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales. Peschard, Jacqueline: “La profesionalización de la Ciencia Política en la Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales” in, Meyer, Lorenzo (1986): La ciencia Política en México: Estado actual y perspectivas, México: FCPyS-UNAM. Puga, Cristina: “Presente y futuro de las Ciencias Sociales”, Revista Universidad de México, 559, México: UNAM (1997), 3-8. Revista Estudios Políticos, 1, México: Centro de Estudios Políticos, UNAM-FCPyS (1975). Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Vol. 30 (115-116), México: UNAM (1984), 130-131. Reyes Heroles, Jesús: “Notas sobre el significado del estudio de la Ciencia Política”, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Vol. 3 (7), México: UNAM, (1957). Rodríguez Araujo, Octavio : “La ciencia Política en (y sobre) México en el siglo XX”, Revista Ciencia, Vol. 52 (3), México: Académica Mexicana de la Ciencia, (2001), 66-75. Roqueñi Ibargüengoitia, Carmen (2013): El desarrollo institucional de la ciencia política en México en el marco de la globalización y el Estado evaluador, México: Programa de Posgrado en Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Romero, María Elena y Valverde Viesca, Karla (Coords.) (2009) Teorías y problemas contemporáneos. Reflexiones desde la ciencia política, México, Universidad de ColimaUNAM. Sánchez, Rubén (1994): “El estudio de la Ciencia Política en Colombia”, Bogotá: Departamento de Ciencia Política, Universidad de los Andes. Silva, Gilberto: “Universidad, investigación y ciencias sociales”, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 136, México: UNAM (1989), 91-107. Sirvent, Carlos: “Testimonios” in, Pérez Correa, Fernando (2004): Facultad de Ciencias Políticas, Historia Testimonial de sus directores, Segunda edición, México: UNAM-FCPyS. Suárez-Iñiguez, Enrique: “La Ciencia Política académica mexicana”, Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 147, México: UNAM, (1992), 213-220. Suárez-Iñiguez, Enrique: “La Ciencia política en México” en: Ciencia Política, Democracia y Elecciones, México: FCPyS-UNAM (1989), 69-92. Suárez-Iñiguez, Enrique (2013): El largo camino hacia la autonomía y la institucionalización de la Ciencia Política, en México y en el mundo, México: Mimeo. Tanaka, Martín: “Los estudios políticos en el Perú: ausencias, desconexión de la realidad y la necesidad de la ciencia política como disciplina”, Revista de Ciencia Política, Vol. 25 (1), (2005), 222-231. Torres, David: “La Ciencia Política en México”, en Paoli Bolio, Francisco (1990): Desarrollo y Organización de las Ciencias Sociales en México, México: CIICH- UNAM. UNAM: “La Escuela Nacional de Jurisprudencia”, <http://www.derecho.unam.mx/>, [Consulted: 27/03/2013]. Facultad de Derecho, UNAM: “La Escuela de Economía”, Facultad de Economía, http://www.economia.unam.mx/facultad/index.html>, [Consulted: 27/03/2013]. UNAM: “La Escuela de Altos Estudios”, UNAM en <http://www.unam.mx/acercaunam/es/unam_tiempo/unam/1910.html>, 27/03/2013)]. < el tiempo, [Consulted: UNESCO (1950): Contemporary Political Science: A Survey of Methods, Research, and Teaching. París: UNESCO Publications. Valverde Viesca, Karla: “Nuestra Ciencia Política y la de otros: comparación entre planes de estudio de la UNAM, Essex, Georgetown y la Complutense”, Revista Estudios Políticos, Cuarta Época, 9, (1995),189-207. Valverde Viesca, Karla (2003): Estado y Desarrollo en México: un análisis sobre las instituciones y el cambio institucional. Tesis de Maestría en Ciencia Política, México: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. Valverde Viesca, Karla (2008): Ideas y procesos históricos sobre el desarrollo social en México. La Ley General de Desarrollo Social y el cambio institucional. Tesis de Doctorado en Ciencias Políticas y Sociales con Orientación en Ciencia Política, México: Programa de Postgrado en Ciencias Políticas y Sociales de la UNAM.